Heads for Tails!
AdvoCATS officially relaunched its Heads for Tails! campaign on Monday 11th August, with the aim of sending an open letter & briefing paper to The Secretary of State for Housing and the Housing Minister on 1st September asking for tenants rights to have pets and for landlords to be able to charge for insurance - exactly 4 years since the original campaign went live, and 1 week before the "ping-pong" process between the House of Commons and House of Lords begins.
The AdvoCATS Letter
PETS charity AdvoCATS is relaunching its Heads for Tails! campaign to make renting a home with pets
easier and fairer for both tenants and landlords on Monday 11th August, exactly 28 days until the Renters
Rights Bill returns for the consultation process between the House of Commons and the House of Lords
on 8th September.
"That's 28 days of building on our already impressive support base and delivering a message to the
Government stressing that the House of Lords got it badly wrong when they voted against a landlord's
right to require pet damage insurance and then voted for a separate pet deposit of three weeks' worth
of rent, just before parliament broke up for the summer recess" says the founder of AdvoCATS, Jen
Berezai.
"We intend to submit an open letter to the Secretary of State for Housing Angela Rayner and the
Minister of State for Housing Matthew Pennycook on 1st September" added Berezai. "The letter will be
signed by all of our supporters from both the Private Rental Sector (PRS) and the animal welfare world. It
will accompany a briefing paper explaining why pet damage insurance is the common-sense solution to
the lack of pet friendly rentals, and is the favoured option of both tenants and landlords."
The House of Lords gave two reasons for voting off the pet damage insurance provision for landlords,
citing the likely cost of such insurance, "potentially £150 a year" and the readiness of the insurance
industry for "enquiries at scale." "
"Both these reasons are completely at odds with reality" claims Berezai. "Let's take cost first. Currently,
many landlords who will allow pets charge a monthly pet rent on top of the normal rent payment. The
average is £25 per pet per month, although we have seen as much as £50 per pet charged. That's £300
per pet per year, whereas an insurance policy would cover an address, ie more than one pet. Insurance
would also come with the potential for a no-claims history, invaluable when moving to a new property,
not to mention several thousand pounds of cover from day one for the landlord. You do the maths!"
Turning to the readiness of the insurance industry, the pets activist claims that the politicians didn't
actually consult the insurance specialists within the PRS, a fact she says was widely acknowledged by the
property press and commentators on LinkedIn. "The industry is ready – very ready. We know of several
providers, many of whom having been working on new products ever since pet damage insurance was
included on the original Renters Reform white paper published in 2022. Others would have followed
during the bill's implementation period."
In a confusing twist, the second amendment voted on by Peers, the introduction of a separate pet
deposit of three weeks worth of rent, seems completely at odds with any budgetary concerns raised.
The average weekly rent in England is £270, meaning tenants would have to find an additional £810 up
front. When added to the standard deposit of 5 weeks worth of rent, that's over two thousand pounds
required.